News, by definition, is information, facts or details reported in the media about something that has happened or will soon happen. In the best of all possible worlds news broadcasters would bring us all sides of the story, but this is rare. Biased information, which assumes agreement or attempts to sway the viewer's opinion to match the opinion of the broadcaster (its management and/or sponsors) is pretty much the norm. Reported events may be true, partially true, misleading or even false. It's quite possible to watch the news every night and still remain uninformed. (If you've been reading my blog you know this is not the first time I've ranted on this subject - see "A Twist on Words", February 12, 2015.)
The closer to home the news is, the more accurate it is likely to be. Happenings in the city the news is broadcast from and in the regions the station serves are easily verifiable and bias is somewhat easy to recognize. Provincial news may show more bias but again a thinking person can often see through it. Move into the national politics and things get fuzzier. Our majority government has way more control than I'd like to see, a bottomless purse to spread its views to the public it "serves", and to campaign for re-election in the guise of taxpayer funded "public service" ads. Head out of the nation to international news...well here's where bias is rampant, probably on nearly every news source you could possibly access.
On Canadian TV there are some in-depth investigative programs but people are busy. If they take the time to watch the news at all, an hour a night is about all the time they are willing or able to spare. It takes time and caring to search out other news sources in order to obtain a broader view. Canadian TV news should get a medal though, compared to the TV news programs in the U.S. The USA, in my opinion, has become so insular that they barely realize the rest of the world exists, and, when they do take note what comes out is slanted (censored?) to such a high degree that they are still basically uninformed. US policy makers appear to pick their enemies for monetary rather than ideological reasons. Their economy is based on war and would suffer greatly should they begin to pull their ever expanding web of troops, war machines, weapons, drones, advisors, and covert agencies out of the many, many countries where they now exert their influence. But their citizens have enough problems at home, no time or energy to worry about the involvement of their country elsewhere. (U.S. blog readers feel free to chime in here.)
But wait! Our national Conservative government is in lock-step with the U.S.! Their enemies are our enemies; their international policies are reflected in ours. Canada was once a neutral nation. We sent peacekeepers overseas, not soldiers. We maintained our right to a viewpoint independent of our stronger neighbor. What happened? The Conservative majority government happened.
Nearly the entire middle-east is at war. There's Shia versus Sunni conflicts (the historic background of the Sunni–Shia split lies in the schism that occurred when the Islamic prophet Muhammad died in the year 632AD.- see Wikipedia). ISIS is gobbling territory and killing unbelievers. People in any country are labelled as "infidels" and become subject to terrorist attack. We seem to be reinventing the Cold War with Russia. The U.S. has finally changed its view on Cuba but has now hung the terrorist tag onto Venezuela. A continuing positive relationship with Israel is becoming more and more difficult due to their conflict with the Palestinians. And so on... It is often very difficult to figure out who is right and who is wrong, and sometimes there is merit on both sides. Is it necessary for Canada to choose sides? War crimes or genocides committed by any nation or faction within a nation should not be ignored, but is it our right to unilaterally police the world? Aren't there non-military humanitarian actions Canada could partake in that would maintain our neutrality?
Citizens of "democratic" countries should not assume that they are entitled to a free ride. Before we blithely agree with the actions of our government, either actively or by apathy, we should make an attempt to be informed. While your attention glides along the mainstream laws can be passed right under your nose, and you will wonder how in the world they came about. The recent law passed in Indiana underscores how "fringe groups can mobilize resources, dominate the debate and help pass draconian and discriminatory laws in democratic countries." (Rafia Zakaria, April 2, 2015, Al Jazeera America, @rafiazakaria)
Your evening news is not enough, it's only part of the picture. There is an internet site called livestation.com (stations like Al Jazeera, BBC, RT America, CCTV-China, etc.) where you can access a broad scope of TV news media presented in English (some at a small charge and some free) that will at the very least present another viewpoint of events outside (and sometimes inside) of Canada as seen by people from other parts of the world. Yes, they too probably have a bias, but hearing another viewpoint will broaden your mind and help you to realize that not everyone sees things the way we do. We are not always right. No one is. You can also get numerous news sites, TV and newspapers, streaming through your FaceBook account simply by going to their web page and "liking" them or you can get news delivered to your e-mail box. If you want a broader view it may be better to divide your news watching time between mainstream news and the internet. Then try hard to eliminate your own bias (you know you're not free of bias don't you?) and obvious quackery while forming your opinions. It's better to be part of an educated electorate (VOTE!) than to blindly glide along assuming all is well and good with your government.
No comments:
Post a Comment